This article was translated from Chinese by Google. It has not been corrected. You may refer to it first. The raw chinese link is 知识应用与回报协议. Follow-up will be proofread.

Knowledge Application and Return Protocol

----- HouHejie.cn @2018.5.3.

The goal of this agreement is to allow knowledge and ideas to be more effectively disseminated, to be applied and rewarded, to replace existing intellectual property systems, to reduce innovators' burdens and application barriers, to accelerate the efficiency of knowledge transfer to practicality, and to give innovators appropriate returns, to encourage and encourage better innovation! At the same time, it can also reduce world-wide repetitive development and increase social efficiency.

The core spirit of this agreement is: ideological price, knowing returns, efficiency, conscience, positive incentives

Application and reward:

Knowledge application: By default, anyone can apply the original knowledge and innovation results in compliance with social morality, and can make adjustments or improvements accordingly.
Applicants should make appropriate returns to the original author. If it can be forwarded or improved, indicate the source. You can also give the original author an appropriate thank you fee after generating economic value.
All returns are mainly based on conscience. For example, when the generated value is limited, voluntary small returns or zero returns may be voluntary. At this time, the original author may not forcibly require the user to return.
When the application produces a large economic value, the user should take the initiative to give the original author a thin return, and the amount of the return will be confirmed by the conscience.
Users should not belittle the value of source knowledge. For example, when there are multiple pieces of knowledge, technology, and innovation used simultaneously, they will deliberately give a certain knowledge and technology to the book at a low price to avoid returns or reduce costs. Typical applications such as applying someone’s program are free. Promote and even lose money against competitors. This situation should also be recorded as a reward for value.
Return on Duration: When the economy is temporarily unsatisfactory, the user may not have to immediately pay back the original value, but instead return with conscience in the future. If a certain knowledge has a good effect on the environment, illness, and physical and mental state, but the current economy is not good, the original value can be given a small amount of return or temporary no return in the future to compensate, or use to help their publicity and other methods to give temporary feedback .
For active rewards, the original author can give incentives such as good image display or assisting his business development with the consent of the returnee.
For those who should have been rewarded without giving, the original valued person may request a penalty-type reward.

Communication and evolution:

Spreading price: both the communicator and the original writer have value and should receive appropriate returns.
Reprint: The default supports the reprinting of original texts or ideas so that the knowledge innovation can be delivered to the people who need it more quickly to generate value. It is also possible to save copies for them in case of loss or falsification.
Reproduced sources: When reprinting, the source of the source file is clearly marked at the beginning and end of the file, and the source URL of the URL is required.
Semi-reproduced: When the source is required for semi-text reloading in order to draw drainage, etc.
Agreement statement: A protocol statement can be added on the page to be claimed, such as 'This article complies with the KARP'. If the webpage can also be placed before reading the statement, for example: insert the code '<script src="http://www.01ta.com/101/KARP1.js"></script>' at the bottom of the webpage.
Evolution: The original can be evolved by default to integrate its own situation, ideas, or for other purposes.
Although the contents listed in this agreement are common sense of social morality, it is clearly listed that it can make it more effective.
This agreement is not mandatory and mainly depends on the implementation of conscience and public opinion.
This agreement can be shared with other agreements, such as BSD & KARP. The former solves the problem of copyright signature and the latter solves economic problems.

Background:

The existing patent examination and approval system is far behind the pace of development of the times. Patent examination and approval requires at least six months or more. Most invention patents take several years or even longer. Many technologies in this cycle may even have been quickly eliminated. Life cycle.
Patent application fees increase the burden on developers, and are particularly detrimental to innovative people or small and medium-sized enterprises with continuous innovation. Even if the government has incentives for reductions, it is still a big burden.
The existing patent examination and approval system will allow many innovators to spend time, energy, money, and resources on how to obtain a patent certificate, instead of using these to improve technology and marketing.
The original intention of the intellectual property system is to protect innovation, but in the current circumstances it will sometimes become a burden and a burden for innovation. For this reason, I have previously written proposals to change the IP system from approval to filing.
At present, there are also some open source protocols around the world, such as the GPL (General Public License), LGPL, GFDL, Mozilla, BSD, MIT, Apache, and the Knowledge Sharing Protocol. These agreements have made tremendous contributions to the dissemination of knowledge sharing in society. However, the focus is only on copyright signature and transparency, but it is lacking in the positive incentive rewards of the knowledge economy.
Existing open source agreements sometimes have huge conflicts with the commercial society, but they have become a resistance to their development. The most typical Linux, such as using the GPL series of protocols, because of its mandatory open source GPL protocol, many hardware vendors that need to protect commercial secrets to survive and develop can not actively provide support drivers for them, and then in desktop systems and other user terminal applications The development has been extremely slow. In recent years, Android developed on this basis has been developed using complex evasion techniques and protocol violations that involve high risk. This agreement is to improve this situation.
We appreciate the spirit of open source and its great contribution, but also respect the economic driving characteristics and values of the business community. First, there are indeed many people in the real world who are still on the verge of living and improving their lives. Second, the economic drivers provide an interface for various social departments. And supply and demand orientation to make it more efficient and orderly.